Powered by People

Articles and Legal News

Please note all of our news and articles are for general information purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. For advice tailored to your circumstances please contact your Saunders & Co lawyer. As well as providing regular news updates on the feed adjacent, we also provide a personalised news email service. To choose what news we send you, click here.

Joint Tenancy Ownership – Wills and Residential Care Subsidy for Long Term Care

Joint Tenancy Ownership – Wills and Residential Care Subsidies

If you and your spouse or partner own a property or multiple properties, it is important to think about how that property  will be dealt with once you pass away. The way you wish to deal with your property or interest in it, will need to be specified in your Will and what is appropriate will depend on how you own the property.

Joint Tenancy vs Tenancy in Common

There are two common forms of property ownership in New Zealand, being joint tenants or tenants in common.

Many couples own their property as joint tenants. What this means if one of them dies is that the ownership of the property automatically goes to the survivor by way of “survivorship”, regardless of what is said in the deceased’s Will.

In contrast, if the couple owns the property as tenants in common, (often in equal shares), then each person can decide what happens to their share of the property by dictating who will take it under their Will. Therefore, survivorship does not apply.

Tenancy in Common and Wills

If a couple owns the property as tenants in common, it is common for them to include a clause in their Will that allows the survivor to remain in the home for the rest of their life, or until they need to vacate (for example, to go into care). The trustees under the Will hold the deceased’s share of the property on trust to allow the survivor to live there and make use of the property until they vacate. Often the Will will specify that the occupation is to be rent free and that the survivor must keep the house maintained and insured.  Upon the survivor’s death or vacation, the deceased’s share of the home then goes to the beneficiaries named under their Will.

Tenancy in Common and Residential Care Subsidies

Owning a property as a tenant in common can also be helpful for Residential Care Subsidy purposes as it reduces the assets owned by the person requiring care. WINZ offers fee subsidies to help people entering rest home or hospital level care. However, the subsidy is only given to those who meet the WINZ asset testing threshold as those who have the resources to support themselves are not deemed as needing of public resources.

Assets that are taken into account include properties, cars or vehicles, bank account funds, investments, shares, even money that has been loaned or gifted away (if it is above the amount allowed by WINZ). Exempt assets are the value of furniture and personal belongings and up to $10,000 worth of pre-paid funeral expenses.

In terms of the asset threshold (as at 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016), the thresholds are in two levels – Threshold A and Threshold B. (Please note that the assets threshold amount changes every July).

Threshold A – $218,598.00    

If you are a single person, or if you are a couple and both of you require rest home care, or you are a person whose spouse/ partner is not a resident requiring care but who has elected to have Threshold A apply to them, your assets must be under $218,598.00 in value.

Threshold B – $119,709.00 

If you are a couple and only one of you requires rest home care and the other has not elected to have Threshold A apply to them, then you must have assets either below $119,709.00 excluding the couple’s home and car.

For those who are above the threshold, they have to wait until their assets diminish to below the threshold before they can start benefiting from the subsidy. Until then, they must pay for their own care. This may involve selling the family home or other assets in order to raise enough funds for the care.

Assets may be diminished by gifting away $6000.00 a year per single person or couple (the permitted amount by WINZ for those in the 5 years before applying for care) and $27,000 per single person or couple outside those years. Alternatively assets may be sold, but of course then the funds become an asset. Giving assets away or selling them below their value will be seen as a deprivation of assets. Likewise, any excessive gifting or loaning of money, no matter how long ago it was done, will be counted as an asset.

If a property is owned as joint tenants when the first spouse/ partner dies, the survivor will then own the whole property by way of survivorship. Should they then require rest home or hospital care, the whole of the value of the house would be taken into account for the asset threshold test. If they had owned the property as tenants in common, only the survivor’s share would be taken into account. Therefore, a way of protecting against this may be by putting assets into tenants in common ownership. If the surviving spouse only owns a half share of the property, there is less for WINZ to include in the assets test.

Retirement planning is often left until people are nearing retirement but as can be seen from the above, it is something that needs to be considered carefully. It is best to plan ahead and sort out your affairs with a lawyer as soon as possible. Wills can always be updated as circumstances, laws or ideas change.  It is worth noting that this is an area of law/WINZ policy that is continually evolving and what was effective planning in the recent past may no longer be the case.

If you would like to speak to someone about your retirement planning and get your affairs in order for your circumstances, please contact your Saunders & Co advisor.

"Through this time we have required the services of the firm for business, personal, and litigation purposes. We have never felt a moment's hesitation in remaining with the firm, and expect to continue a long and prosperous relationship with Saunders & Co. into the future."

Colin and Julie Erickson, Cube Developments Limited

"Excellent law firm to deal with. Excellent communication and service."

Carmel Kokshoorn, Property Owner

"Thanks Hornby Law for your professional and helpful advice. It is nice when everything runs smoothly."

Barry and Natalie Gibb

"We have found them reliable, timely and professional. They have added value to our business by being effective and decisive. Their friendly manner whilst conducting business means that we have felt comfortable seeking their advice no matter how major or minor the query may be. We would have no hesitation in recommending Saunders & Co to family, friends and business associates."

Cymon and Angela Allfrey, Cymon Allfrey Architects Ltd

"Very prompt and efficient service. I have been very well informed and kept up to date on matters. To be recommended. Thank you."

Suzanne Henderson, Property

"The professional and friendly service provided by Jenni Hunter allowed us to buy our first home without fuss stress or delays, absolutely seamless! Amenable, and more importantly always accessible to clarify and assist, Jenni proved you can get an exclusive personal service without paying Auckland barrister prices."

James Craig, Home Buyer

"Always happy with service and professionalism at Hornby Law. Never had any reason or desire to change firms; friendly, welcoming, professional and easy to do business with."

Frans and Rose-Marie van Zoggel

"Thank you Ria and your team for the excellent work in completing the sale on such a short turnaround, that's why I always use Saunders & Co."

Ashley Patten, Property Owner

"I have worked with Saunders & Co on both a professional and personal basis for over 10 years. I have always found their service and quality of legal advice to be first rate. Attention to detail and timeliness is important to our business, and Saunders & Co have always performed in these critical areas."

Ian McNabb, Ngai Tahu Property Limited